Tuesday 20 May 2025
           
Tuesday 20 May 2025
       
Land tribunals face backlog of over 4 lakh cases
Lack of judges, staff stalls justice
Special correspondent
Publish: Wednesday, 16 April, 2025, 10:23 AM

A staggering backlog of over four lakh cases is currently pending in Land Survey Tribunals across the country, with about 1.5 lakh cases remaining unresolved for more than five years, according to court-related sources. In addition, the Land Survey Appeal Tribunals are grappling with more than 8,500 pending cases, further highlighting the strain on the justice system when it comes to resolving land-related disputes.
Alarmingly, around 1 lakh new cases have been added to the existing backlog in the last five years alone, indicating a deepening crisis that experts attribute to inadequate staffing and slow disposal rates at both tribunal and appeal levels.
Legal analysts have long warned that the inefficiency of Land Survey Tribunals is causing prolonged distress for citizens seeking redress in land ownership and boundary disputes-issues that are often linked to livelihoods and inheritance.
The growing pendency has renewed calls for urgent reforms, including the appointment of more judges and support staff, the introduction of digital case management systems, and streamlined hearing procedures to expedite the resolution process.
Despite repeated policy pledges to improve land governance, the situation appears to be worsening, raising concerns over access to timely justice and the risk of further legal complications in an already overwhelmed system.
A Complex History: The Origin of Land Survey Disputes: The issue of land survey disputes traces its roots to the country’s historical land reform initiatives, particularly the BRS (Bharatiya Revenue Survey) initiated in 1984. At that time, the government aimed to standardize and modernize the process of land surveying across the country. However, instead of simplifying the process, the survey has created an environment where multiple errors and discrepancies have emerged in the land records. These errors, including wrong demarcations, missing details, and mistakes in survey maps, have led to disputes over land ownership.
The original objective of the BRS was to create a uniform land record system to avoid land-related disputes. But the implementation of this project has been riddled with mistakes and delays, many of which are attributed to corruption, the incompetence of field officers, and bureaucratic mismanagement. In numerous instances, land that is recorded in the official forms does not even appear on the survey maps, while in some cases, land that is included in the maps is absent from the official records. Even more perplexing, there are instances where the surveyed land does not correspond with the actual boundaries occupied by landowners for generations. This discrepancy in land records has led to numerous legal battles and claims of ownership, contributing significantly to the rising number of land survey cases in the tribunals.
The Current Crisis: A Backlog of Lakhs of Cases: As of the latest figures, nearly four lakh land survey cases remain pending across the country. What is even more alarming is that out of these, approximately 150,000 cases have been unresolved for more than five years. These delays have not only caused immense inconvenience and financial loss to the landowners involved, but they have also undermined the very purpose of the tribunals, which were meant to expedite the resolution of land-related disputes.
The lack of an effective initiative to address this mounting backlog has raised concerns among both legal experts and the general public. The absence of a streamlined process or any major reforms to speed up the disposal of these cases has left many individuals stranded in a prolonged state of uncertainty, unable to resolve their land disputes or gain clarity about their property rights. With over 100,000 new cases added to the backlog in the last five years alone, it is evident that the problem is only worsening.
The Land Survey Tribunals: A Glimpse into the Administrative Failure: The Land Survey Tribunals were established with the aim of resolving land-related disputes that arose due to the faulty BRS survey. Initially, these tribunals were intended to be a mechanism to speed up the resolution of land disputes. In 2012, the government created 42 land survey tribunals across the countries, which were later expanded to 58 independent tribunals. However, despite the establishment of these tribunals, the situation remains largely unchanged. The pending cases continue to pile up, and the lack of infrastructure, judicial capacity, and support staff makes it impossible for these tribunals to function efficiently.
While the number of tribunals has increased over the years, there is still a significant shortage of judges, staff, and resources to handle the growing number of cases. The legal process remains slow, and the backlog of cases continues to expand, which has prompted the government to propose the creation of additional tribunals. According to court-related sources, there has been a proposal to establish 13 new Land Survey Tribunals and 54 independent Appeal Tribunals. However, this proposal is currently stuck in bureaucratic limbo. The required posts for judges and supporting officers have not been created, and there seems to be no concerted effort to resolve the systemic issues that are contributing to the backlog.
The Absence of Land Survey Appeal Tribunals: Perhaps the most glaring issue within the land survey adjudication system is the absence of a functional Land Survey Appeal Tribunal. Under the current legal framework, any appeal against a decision made by the Land Survey Tribunal has to be taken to the High Court, a process that is not only time-consuming but also highly expensive for the litigants. This system has resulted in delays of years, and many landowners find themselves unable to challenge the decisions made by the tribunals due to financial constraints.
In response to this problem, the High Court issued a directive in October 2020, ordering the formation of an independent Land Survey Appeal Tribunal within 90 days. This ruling was a step in the right direction, as it recognized the need for an effective appellate body for land disputes. However, more than four years have passed since the court’s directive, and no substantial progress has been made in implementing this order. The government finally amended the State Acquisition and Tenancy Act of 1950 in 2023, but despite this, the creation of the Appeal Tribunals is still pending.
Under the amended law, it was proposed that judges of the rank of District Judge be appointed to head these appeal tribunals. However, the logistical hurdles involved in setting up these tribunals and appointing the requisite personnel have proven insurmountable. Consequently, landowners continue to suffer as their appeals remain unresolved, and they are left with little recourse to challenge the decisions made by the survey tribunals.
The Government’s Response: A Proposal Stuck in Bureaucracy: The lack of decisive action on the part of the government is one of the key factors behind the growing backlog of land survey cases. Despite recognizing the issue, the government’s efforts to resolve the problem have been largely inadequate. The proposal to create additional tribunals and appoint more judges and staff has been mired in red tape, with no clear timeline for implementation.
Legal experts and activists have pointed out that the failure to create the necessary infrastructure and the lack of political will to tackle the problem have left citizens at the mercy of an overburdened and ineffective judicial system. They argue that without a strong commitment to resolving the issue, the backlog will continue to grow, and more people will be forced into prolonged legal battles.
Furthermore, the situation is compounded by the widespread corruption and inefficiency that plague the land survey process. Many field officers involved in the surveying of land have been accused of negligence, corruption, and incompetence. As a result, the land records remain full of errors, and landowners continue to suffer from the consequences of these mistakes. In the absence of proper oversight and accountability, these issues have only worsened over time.
The Impact on Landowners:  The growing backlog of land survey cases has had a devastating impact on the lives of millions of landowners across the country. Many individuals, particularly in rural areas, have been deprived of their rightful property due to the errors in the land survey. The prolonged legal battles not only drain their financial resources but also create an atmosphere of uncertainty, preventing them from using or selling their land.
In some cases, landowners who have occupied their properties for generations are facing the threat of losing their land due to errors in the survey records. This has led to widespread dissatisfaction and anger among the affected communities, with many questioning the government’s commitment to resolving the issue.
The government must urgently address the backlog and take concrete steps to reform the land survey system. This includes fast-tracking the establishment of additional tribunals, appointing more judges and staff, and creating a functional Land Survey Appeal Tribunal. Moreover, there is a need for greater transparency and accountability in the surveying process to prevent future errors and disputes.
A System at Breaking Point: The backlog of land survey cases is a reflection of the larger issues of inefficiency, corruption, and poor governance within India’s land administration system. The government’s failure to resolve the backlog in a timely and effective manner has led to prolonged legal battles, financial losses, and a sense of hopelessness among millions of landowners. As the number of unresolved cases continues to rise, it is imperative that the government take immediate and decisive action to reform the system and ensure that justice is delivered to those whose land rights have been unjustly violated. Without a comprehensive overhaul of the land survey and adjudication process, the suffering of landowners will only continue, and the backlog will become an ever more insurmountable problem.
Land Survey Disputes: Stuck in Bureaucratic Red Tape, Solutions Remain Elusive: In the ongoing battle to resolve India’s growing land survey case backlog, sources have revealed that the proposal for establishing 54 independent Land Survey Appeal Tribunals, an essential step towards clearing the mounting pile of cases, has run into yet another bureaucratic hurdle. After the amendment to the State Acquisition and Tenancy Act of 2023, which called for the creation of new posts to facilitate the establishment of these tribunals, the Law Ministry sent a proposal to the Public Administration Ministry. However, the proposal was approved only for the creation of 26 district judge posts, significantly fewer than the required 54. Now, the proposal is stalled in the Finance Department, further delaying the resolution of land disputes that affect millions of people across the country.
The Land Survey Crisis: A Growing Backlog of Cases: For years, millions of Indian citizens have been caught in the complex and often frustrating process of resolving land disputes, many of which stem from errors in the land surveys conducted since 1984. The backlog of cases has only worsened over time, with no clear solution in sight. Today, nearly four lakh cases remain pending, including over 150,000 cases that have been unresolved for more than five years. As the backlog grows, the need for an effective mechanism to address these disputes has become more urgent than ever. In response to the mounting crisis, the government amended the State Acquisition and Tenancy Act in 2023, intending to provide a legal framework for the establishment of independent Land Survey Appeal Tribunals. These tribunals were supposed to expedite the resolution of disputes by offering a dedicated platform for hearing land survey cases. However, despite the amendment, progress has been slow. The Law Ministry forwarded a proposal to create 54 new tribunals, along with the required posts for district judges and supporting staff. However, the Public Administration Ministry approved the proposal only for the creation of 26 posts of district judges, a move that has left the much-needed expansion of tribunals in limbo.
Bureaucratic Bottlenecks: Stuck in the Finance Department: The delay in approving the full set of posts for district judges and supporting personnel has further exacerbated the issue. According to sources, the proposal is currently stuck in the Finance Department, where approval is required for the funding necessary to fill these posts. The failure to allocate adequate resources to the tribunals has left the entire process in a state of stagnation, effectively preventing any significant movement toward resolving the backlog of cases.
The Impact on the Common People: Former judges of the Land Survey Tribunal have pointed out that land survey cases are not just complex legal matters; they directly involve the lives and livelihoods of ordinary people. Land disputes often involve individuals who have occupied their properties for generations, and these unresolved cases threaten their ownership rights. According to these judges, the current system, where district judges are handling land survey appeals alongside other cases, is grossly inadequate. The backlog continues to grow, and the burden on district judges, who are already handling numerous other cases, is becoming unsustainable.
In the absence of dedicated Land Survey Appeal Tribunals, these cases continue to pile up, leading to further delays and prolonged uncertainty for landowners. The need for independent tribunals that can solely focus on land survey disputes is paramount, say experts, as it would not only speed up the resolution process but also improve the efficiency of the legal system as a whole.
Calls for Urgent Action from Legal Experts: As the situation becomes increasingly dire, legal experts have weighed in on the pressing need for urgent reforms. Senior Supreme Court lawyer Manzil Morshed, who has long been involved in land-related legal matters, emphasized the complexity of land survey disputes. He called for immediate action to resolve the backlog by establishing the required number of tribunals and appellate tribunals in each district. Morshed also highlighted the danger of further delays. If the creation of posts for judges and supporting personnel continues to be stalled, he warned, the backlog will only continue to grow, exacerbating the already difficult situation. The government’s lack of timely action, according to Morshed, is allowing the problem to spiral out of control. “It is imperative that the government treats these issues with utmost priority. Land survey disputes are not just legal battles-they are disputes that affect people’s homes, livelihoods, and security. If we don’t act quickly, the consequences will be catastrophic,” Morshed said. 
A Plea for Special Measures: Both legal experts and former judges have stressed the need for special measures to address the current crisis. A multi-pronged approach, which includes the creation of independent tribunals in every district, increased staffing, and faster appointment processes, is necessary to curb the backlog of land survey cases. While the Public Administration Ministry’s decision to approve only 26 posts has been a significant setback, experts argue that this is just a symptom of a deeper problem within the administrative and political framework. To make real progress, they contend, the government needs to take concrete steps to break the bureaucratic gridlock and ensure that the necessary resources are allocated swiftly. “The government must set a deadline for the implementation of these tribunals. There is no alternative but to establish a network of independent appeal tribunals across districts. The issue cannot be ignored any longer,” said a former judge involved in land survey cases.
Addressing the Root Causes: The land survey dispute backlog is not just a case of administrative inefficiency-it is a symptom of a larger issue of inadequate land management and governance. The flawed implementation of the BRS land survey in 1984, combined with years of neglect and under-resourcing, has resulted in a massive backlog that is now threatening to overwhelm the legal system. To effectively resolve these disputes, the government must address the root causes of the backlog, which includes: Expediting the creation of Land Survey Appeal Tribunals: These tribunals must be established in every district to ensure timely resolution of disputes. Increasing the number of judges and staff: More judges and supporting staff need to be appointed to handle the growing number of cases. Reforming the land survey process: The government must address the systemic issues in the land survey process, including corruption, negligence, and outdated practices, to prevent future errors and disputes. Allocating resources for the establishment of tribunals: The Finance Department must act swiftly to approve funding for the new tribunals and ensure that they are properly staffed.
A Call for Immediate Action: The situation regarding land survey disputes is a ticking time bomb. With each passing day, the backlog grows, and millions of landowners remain trapped in legal limbo. The lack of an independent and efficient system to resolve these disputes is causing immense hardship, particularly for rural populations who rely on their land for survival. As the government continues to grapple with bureaucratic delays and internal roadblocks, it is crucial that it take immediate and decisive action to address the backlog. Only through the creation of a robust, well-staffed, and independent network of Land Survey Appeal Tribunals can the country hope to resolve the land disputes that have plagued it for decades. The legal community, experts, and landowners alike are calling for urgent reforms-it’s time for the government to listen and act before the crisis escalates beyond control.



Type your opinion
LATEST NEWS
MOST READ
Editor: Dr. Enayet Karim
Printed from City Publishing House Limited by the Editor from Sheba Nurjahan Eycon Center (4th Floor,) 60 Purana Paltan, Dhaka-1000
Tel: News: 02 223385318-19, 9577145, Advt: 9578898, e-mail: industry_bd@yahoo.com
Developed By: i2soft
🔝